On 2/17/12 8:18 PM, Matt Soucy wrote:
On 02/17/2012 08:57 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, February 18, 2012 02:53:44 Timon Gehr wrote:
If you want it to be executable as a script, rdmd works just fine.
But is there any guarantee that rdmd will even be on the system? It
seems much
safer to me to use dmd, since dmd _will_ be there if you're
programming in D,
but rdmd may or may not be there.
- Jonathan M Davis
Aah, whoops. I forgot about dmd -run.
I think rdmd can be safely assumed to be alongside dmd. If our
installers don't do that, they're in error.
Andrei
