Le 17/02/2012 17:17, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
Agreed. Timon, could you please submit to bugzilla?
BTW I referred to the converse problem:
class C {
void foo() {}
void foo() const {}
}
class D : C {
void foo() const {} // should only override the const overload
}
Andrei
On 2/17/12 8:00 AM, kenji hara wrote:
I think this is a current implementation problem.
In this case, just `override void foo()` in class D should override
the method in C.
And `void foo()const` should be a new overlodad of foo.
Kenji Hara
2012/2/17 Timon Gehr<timon.g...@gmx.ch>:
On 02/17/2012 02:33 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
Introducing a new overload against const in a subclass is illegal:
class C{
void foo(){}
}
class D : C{
override void foo(){}
override void foo()const{}
}
Error: D.foo multiple overrides of same function
Oops...
I meant
class C{
void foo(){}
}
class D:C{
override void foo(){}
void foo()const{}
}
The error message is the same though.
I guess that is such a case, const should be explicited to get rid of
abiguous code.
