"dennis luehring" <dl.so...@gmx.net> wrote in message news:jhtrh1$113l$1...@digitalmars.com... >> Again, I think this thread clarified we need the "Variant[string] info;" >> member however we define the hierarchy. > > to use an mighty hyper map capable of holding all informative "values" > will just follow in the same amount of non-using code, and the using code > will be filled up with info["blub"], info["blab"], evil castings, sensless > const key-string an still no proper way to show/use the information in an > generic and typesafe way > > sorry but feels like throwing anway the signature conecpt and replace it > with an runtime thing ... maybe we should also get rid of function > signatures with "Variant[string] parameter" :} >
Exactly. It smacks of abandoning normal code in favor of JS and other such ultra-dynamic toy/scripting langauges where *everything* is a mutable AA just for the fuck of it.