Le 20/02/2012 20:45, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
On Monday, February 20, 2012 20:42:28 deadalnix wrote:
Le 20/02/2012 20:27, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
On Monday, February 20, 2012 11:15:08 H. S. Teoh wrote:
That's why I proposed to use runtime reflection to scan the exception
object for applicable fields. Then you get the best of both worlds: the
message formatter doesn't need to know what the fields are, and you get
full compile-time type checking for catching code that directly accesses
the fields.
That would certainly be better.
- Jonathan M Davis
This is way better than Variant[string], but unimplemented ATM.
Yes, but you can use compile-time constructs to generate it. And as you
pointed out in another post, tupleof should do the trick. Regardless, the
point is that using reflection of some kind is a much better solution than
using variant.
- Jonathan M Davis
Agreed !
