Do you know what happened to the rest of the intel disassembly? It ends rather abruptly... I'd use the other listing but the callq instructions seem to be displaying the return address instead of the target address.
"Martin Nowak" <d...@dawgfoto.de> wrote in message news:op.v96domsnsqu...@dawg-freebsd.lan... > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:02:05 +0100, Daniel Murphy > <yebbl...@nospamgmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks heaps! Only failing for cfloat+ now! >> I've updated the pull, do you mind doing it again? >> >> "Martin Nowak" <d...@dawgfoto.de> wrote in message >> news:op.v958yuyvsqu...@dawg-freebsd.lan... >>> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 06:57:22 +0100, Daniel Murphy >>> <yebbl...@nospamgmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I've been trying to fix issue 4155, but it's a little difficult without >>>> the >>>> ability to test on x64 (I'm on win32). Could anybody compile the >>>> following >>>> code for me with 'dmd -m64' with this patch >>>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/760 and send me the >>>> disassembly? >>>> >>> http://codepad.org/1w2jRctt - objconv >>> http://codepad.org/pOCsPsMi - objdump (doesn't know sahf) >> >> > Intel or AT&T? > > http://codepad.org/4Gr237NH - dmd -c bug2.d && objconv -fasm bug2.o > http://codepad.org/MhqFv8ik - dmd -c bug2.d && objdump -d bug2.o
