On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:24:08AM +0100, David Nadlinger wrote: > On Monday, 27 February 2012 at 22:39:47 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: > >[…] But I don't understand what's the difference between > >_d_assocarrayliteralT() and _d_assocarrayliteralTX()? When are they > >called, and in which context? > > If I'm not mistaken (straight from my memory, didn't look it up > again), _d_assocarrayliteralT() is no longer in use, it was replaced > by _d_assocarrayliteralTX() some while ago, which doesn't require > C-style variadics. [...]
Hmm. I'm trying to trace down what's causing the bug, but apparently _d_assocarrayliteralTX is never called?? Did the compiler recently change in the way it creates AA literals? T -- Never trust an operating system you don't have source for! -- Martin Schulze
