On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:09:17 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
<schvei...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:39:28 -0500, Jose Armando Garcia
<jsan...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com>
wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 09:14:16 so wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 March 2012 at 07:46:14 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-03-06 02:32, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
> The user can then alias "log!info" to "info" if he/she wants to.
Again, you are now forcing 2 common names instead of one as it is
now.
When you instantiate log!info where do you get "info" from?
Yes. My mistake - probably because the time stuff typicall takes such a
template argument as string, which would make this log!"info"(msg).
However,
adding _log_ isn't necessarily bad, given that this is std.log that
we're
talking about. It's info and the rest that are the problem.
Seriously everyone. What are we spending some much effort on this?
Because naming is important. It's very difficult to change names once
something is released. I seriously could care less about implementation
(didn't even look at it). That can be fixed. Naming can't.
What is wrong with:
import log = std.log;
log.info("cool");
What is wrong with
import std.log;
log.info("cool");
alternatively:
log_info("cool");
linfo("cool");
lginfo("cool");
There are so many choices besides just "info." We should use something
else.
-Steve
