On 3/10/12 4:37 AM, Manu wrote:
I still fundamentally see a clear divide between a Tuple, which is a deliberately structured association of multiple values, and 'multiple return values' which is an explicit non-association of multiple returned things.
There is no difference. A Tuple is a product type, exactly like superposing arbitrary values together.
You need to address that principle before I can begin to accept the idea of abusing a structured tuple as a substitute for this important language feature. My analogy is the function argument list. You don't think of the arguments you pass to a function as a Tuple (is it implemented internally in this way? if so, it is well hidden, and perhaps similar magic can be done...) You pass, TO a function, multiple un-associated values.
This analogy is tenuous for D because functions are defined to return one type, e.g. typeof(fun(args)) is defined. Once we get into disallowing that for certain functions, we're looking at major language changes for little benefit.
Andrei
