"Steven Schveighoffer" <schvei...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:op.wa1432xjeav7ka@localhost.localdomain... > > You may want to consider -- if you on principle don't view pages with > information because the pages contain JS, you are the one missing out on > the information. >
And it's not on principle, I just find it not usually worth bothering. I'd rather just move on to something else that's actually well designed. Problem though is when content gets *tied* to such moronic things. Even if 99% of people don't hate JS, these uses of it *are* still moronic bullshit.
