"Alex Rønne Petersen" <xtzgzo...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:jjqn9f$1iht$1...@digitalmars.com... > > But then... why not just make it take a dstring? Maybe I'm not following > your intent here... >
Probably because then this becomes an error: string s = "abc"; func(s); It's an interesting problem. I'm not aware of a solution. I suppose you'd just have to make it take only dstring and then expect string/wstring vars to be handled by the caller like "func(to!dstring(s))"
