Le vendredi 16 mars 2012 à 02:23 +0100, ixid a écrit : > D is a very poor name for a language. I appreciate it's late in > the day for this and that it has probably been discussed before > (not that I could find such a discussion with Google which > relates to my point). Although the results for D are fine when > googling for things like "D tutorial", more obscure terms are > hard to find because "d" is so commonly used as a variable name. > Searchability is important though I understand that this might be > seen as a trivial point, it is a major human factor. The language > would be far better off with a 3 to 5 letter identifier. It will > succeed or fail for other reasons but an easily searchable name > would help. Dlang as the search term isn't good enough because > it's not actually the language's name, people don't use it that > much when referring to D, nor do they usually use D2.
as you said, we have already talk about this. yes D is not really a good name for search on the web. Commonly we use these keywords: - TDPL - dlang - d programming - d tuto - d wiki regards