On Friday, March 16, 2012 16:00:47 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Martin Nowak" <d...@dawgfoto.de> wrote in message
> news:op.wa9r9izqsqugbd@localhost...
>
> > On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:53:45 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
> >
> > <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
> >> Just found this, has anyone tried dmd or friends on OpenBSD?
> >>
> >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9698581/programming-in-d-for-openbsd
> >
> > OpenBSD would need some druntime work.
>
> Do you have anything in particular in mind?
Probably everything that's not straight Posix would require changes. For
instance, every place that has a version(FreeBSD) block would probably need a
version(OpenBSD) block. It's probably not all that hard to make the changes,
but they'd still need to be done.
The very fact that Walter pushes for the model of
version(A) {}
else version(B) {}
else static assert("Unsupported OS");
means that _any_ new OS requires druntime work, even if it's minimal. That's
not necessarily a bad thing, since there's a definite chance that the new OS
requires additional changes specific to it anyway, but as long as there is
sections of druntime are OS-specific without generic versions provided (which
isn't going to change), you can't just use druntime with a new OS without
updating druntime.
- Jonathan M Davis
