On 18.03.2012 6:50, bearophile wrote:
I need to attract a bit of your attention to this:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7670

Currently this (very nice) code gets accepted even with the -property
compiler switch:

[1, 2, -3, 4].filter!(x => x > 0).map!(x => x ^^ 0.2).writeln;


I fail to see how property should affect this code in any way, no '=' anywhere in sight.
UFCS is indeed nice.


--
Dmitry Olshansky

Reply via email to