Re: Nested functions should be exempt from sequential visibility rules

[deadalnix]

Le 03/04/2012 07:38, Nick Sabalausky a écrit :

Regarding this:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=790

I submit that nested functions should be exempt from the usual sequential
visibility rules. (Therefore, mutually recursive nested functions would
become possible.)

Or at the very *least*, this horrific C-like workaround should be possible:

void foo()
{
     void b();
     void a() {...};
     void b() {...};
}

...Flame away! ;)

This is a +1 .