Le 06/04/2012 17:00, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
On 4/6/12 5:06 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/6/2012 2:41 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
The last time custom attributes where discussed, a C# like model was
proposed. Is there a good reason why we should deviate from the C#
implementation?
C# uses a runtime implementation, not a compile time one.
Speaking of the distinction, it would be great if we arranged things
such that attributes are a lowering to existing D (i.e. the compiler
rewrites a nice attribute syntax into clunky D code you wouldn't want to
write by hand).
Lowerings have worked miracles for us in terms of keeping language
semantics simple and reducing implementation bugs. We should use them
wherever appropriate.
Andrei
Again, I rise the need of AOP.
No need for runtime attribute or compiler magic if we have AOP that
could interleave « clunky D code you wouldn't want to write by hand »
without adding yet again another language feature.
