"Artur Skawina" <art.08...@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:mailman.1480.1333900846.4860.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>
> Note that my point is just that the compiler needs to emit a dummy
> so that the addresses remain unique, eg
>
>   module.f!uint:
>       jmp module.f!int
>

Or use a nop slide before the start of the function.  Since we're modifying 
the object file format anyway, it would be trivial for the compiler to mark 
functions which have their address taken as needing a unique address. 


Reply via email to