Le 29/04/2012 22:40, Alex Rønne Petersen a écrit :
On 29-04-2012 00:04, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:58:19PM +0200, deadalnix wrote:
[...]
- is is messed up. It is a massive hack and have to be rationalized.
As I said in another thread, the _functionality_ of various is()
expressions are very useful and should be kept. But the _syntax_ is
completely b0rked and needs some serious redesign.
- version is a bad version of static if. The static if part of the
version must go.
What's your proposal?
- comma expression is confusing and have very little benefice.
+1. I say that D3 should drop the comma operator. Esp. when doing so
will open up the way for having native syntax for tuples. Needing to
resort to Phobos to have a way to name a compiler-supported type is
backwards and silly.
- out arguments. We can return tuples, out argument is going
backward in history.
Not when there's no way to name tuples without resorting to Phobos (or
copy-n-paste Phobos code).
- many array properties (.sort for instance) are useless and would
be way better as libs.
Yeah, .sort is redundant, and besides shouldn't be an array "property"
to begin with.
T
Let's not forget .reverse. Why these are properties (and .dup/.idup) is
seriously beyond me.....
Why they are not provided as lib but by the core language ?
