On 2012-04-30 21:56, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 30-04-2012 21:43, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-04-30 17:27, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 30-04-2012 09:58, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I would rather have @property on instance variables be a syntax sugar
for implementing property functions. Basically virtual instance
variables.
Then there better be a way to mark them final too. ;)
Then what's the point of having a method? Just use a public instance
variable.
Encapsulation. I want contracts in my properties.
Aha, didn't thin of that. Sure, why not.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
