Wouldn't "physical" const-ness be an implementation detail of the object, and therefore, impossible to determine by the user of the object?
In the world of OOP, when would "guarantee"ing (so to speak) 'physical'
const-ness ever be handy?
- Re: Why D const is annoying Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Why D const is annoying bearophile
- Re: Why D const is annoying Mehrdad
- Re: Why D const is annoying Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Why D const is annoying Chris Cain
- Re: Why D const is annoying Mehrdad
- Re: Why D const is annoying Chris Cain
- Re: Why D const is annoying Chris Cain
- Re: Why D const is annoying Mehrdad
- Re: Why D const is annoying Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Why D const is annoying Mehrdad
- Re: Why D const is annoying Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Why D const is annoying Mehrdad
- Re: Why D const is annoying Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Why D const is annoying Mehrdad
- Re: Why D const is annoying Michel Fortin
- Re: Why D const is annoying Mehrdad
- Re: Why D const is annoying Jacob Carlborg
- Re: Why D const is annoying Mehrdad
- Re: Why D const is annoying Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Why D const is annoying Timon Gehr