On Wed, 09 May 2012 17:49:34 -0400, deadalnix <deadal...@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 09/05/2012 23:38, Nick Sabalausky a écrit :
Maybe, but I suspect most "not OSS" complaints would be coming from
people
who don't even know that much about D, and are just knee-jerking over
"The
main compiler's backend isn't OSS?!? Well fuck that, then!"
'Course, I have zero evidence to back up that assertion.
Just compare the number of contribution since the project have been
mostly open sourced on on github. Numbers speak for themselves.
I think this was more of a factor of github than open source -- The
compiler was open sourced (in the same manner as it is on github) for
years on dsource.org under subversion.
See here: http://dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/183
-Steve
