On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:18:36PM -0700, Adam Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 09 May 2012 21:12:53 -0700, Nick Sabalausky > <seewebsitetocontac...@semitwist.com> wrote: [...] > >Well, if that works for the PHBs, then it works for me (Hmm...Never > >thought I'd say something like that ;) )
Beware the dark side! ;-) > >Thinking about it more, I suppose it's debatable whether a > >PHB-comlpiant obfuscator or a lib-with-embedded-source would be > >easier to implement and deal with. > > > > I'm a fan of embedded source as it's relatively easy to get from the > compiler when it's time to build the output file. No extra steps > required. :-) [...] Exactly. We can satisfy the PHBs *and* have our fun with loading ASTs from the compiler too. Sounds like a win-win situation to me. T -- Some days you win; most days you lose.