On 5/11/12 9:55 PM, jerro wrote:
Yes, "in" for statically-sized arrays does make sense because the
complexity if bound at compilation time.

Andrei

But complexity is not the only problem with the proposed
operator in for arrays. That operator does not represent the
same operation as operator in for associative arrays.

That's a good argument, but then you may think of the array as a small set, which would have the same semantics.

Andrei

Reply via email to