On 5/11/12 9:55 PM, jerro wrote:
Yes, "in" for statically-sized arrays does make sense because the complexity if bound at compilation time.AndreiBut complexity is not the only problem with the proposed operator in for arrays. That operator does not represent the same operation as operator in for associative arrays.
That's a good argument, but then you may think of the array as a small set, which would have the same semantics.
Andrei
