On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 07:57:28PM -0700, Walter Bright wrote: > On 5/14/2012 6:29 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote: > >While we're at it, do we want to keep std.outbuffer? > > Since it's not range based, probably not.
Why not just fold this into std.io? I'm surprised that this is a separate module, actually. It should either be folded into std.io, or developed to be more generic (i.e., have range-based API, have more features like auto-flushing past a certain size, etc.). T -- Prosperity breeds contempt, and poverty breeds consent. -- Suck.com