On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:46 AM, deadalnix <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le 15/05/2012 18:19, Gor Gyolchanyan a écrit : > >> >> >> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Christophe >> <[email protected] >> <mailto:travert@phare.**normalesup.org<[email protected]>>> >> wrote: >> >> using printf will lead to a bug each time the programmer forget the >> trailing >> \0. >> >> >> First of all, printf shouldn't be used! There's writef and it's superior >> to printf in any way! >> Second of all, if the zero-termination of literals are to be removed, >> the literals will no longer be accepted as a pointer to a character. >> The appropriate type mismatch error will force the user to use toUTF8z >> to get ht e zero-terminated utf-8 version of the original string. >> In case it's a literal, one could use the compile-time version of >> toUTF8z to avoid run-time overhead. >> This all doesn't sound like a bad idea to me. I don't see any security >> or performance flaws in this scheme. >> -- >> Bye, >> Gor Gyolchanyan. >> > > May god ear you ! > Unfortunately, using writef/writefln would make DRuntime depend on Phobos, which is unacceptable.
