On Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:05:46 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> Hm... proposal:
>
> foreach(e; ref r)
> {
> }
>
> equates to your desired code. Would this help?
Or you could just do
for(; !r.empty; r.popFront())
{
auto e = r.front;
}
I really don't think that that's a big deal. I don't think that the language
change would be worth having yet another thing in the language to remember,
particularly when it's so easy to just use for to do the job.
- Jonathan M Davis
