On Fri, 25 May 2012 08:39:17 +0200, Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com> wrote:
On 2012-05-24 21:16, Sean Kelly wrote:
I think a lot of this depends on the type of app. Interactive
debugging can be impractical for server apps, but is often easy for
desktop apps. Either way, I don't think anyone can say that debugger
support isn't important for D in general :-)
I think a proper stack trace is more useful in most of the cases for me.
That's basically the only thing I use a debugger for. D won't show a
stack trace on a segmentation fault and similar.
No stack trace sucks...
class C { int a; }
C c;
c.a = 1; // --- killed by signal 11
assert(c); // nice stack trace
Couldn't dmd automatically add an assert(c) in debug mode before accessing
members?
I would really like to see (easy to use) non-null references. Non-null by
default would have been best.
