On Thu, 31 May 2012 12:06:45 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
On 5/31/12 3:27 AM, Regan Heath wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2012 10:49:27 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
On 5/31/12 2:45 AM, Regan Heath wrote:
Ok, how about you tell us what term you want to use for the current
state of affairs then, because arguing about this is pointless and I'm
happy to use whatever term you deem appropriate (because I couldn't
care
less what the term is - as long as we all know what is meant, which I
believe is the case here).
The idiom is called "scoped locking".
So.. the mutex is "scoped locking"?
No, the Java-style approach with the synchronized statement etc.
*sigh* I give up, this is pointless.
R
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
