On 2012-05-31 10:01, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I understand how frustrating this is. In fact even the way you consider "good" is not nearly good enough. What we need is really more formalization of the language design, something that we're sorely missing. I am sometimes frustrated out of my mind at the lack of rigor and discipline in the process. On the other hand, we march with the troops we have.
Yeah, "good" should have been "better". I'm not sure what you mean with "we march with the troops we have" but it would be fairly easy to at least improve the process somewhat. It would require any extra manpower. It's just that you, Walter and the community needs to be willing to do the changes.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
