Timon Gehr , dans le message (digitalmars.D:170185), a écrit : > On 06/19/2012 07:18 PM, Christophe Travert wrote: > In 2., mutable data referred to by a const reference might be changed > through it.
Then it is not a const reference, it is a normal reference. Qualifying the reference as 'const' does not by you anything at all. Of course it should not change immutable data, no delegate should do that ! You might state that frame pointer are opaque, have no const qualifier, and that any delegates is callable even if they are in a const structure. But saying a reference (frame pointer) can be const AND modify data is a bit weird. -- Christophe