On 10-Jul-12 19:00, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/10/2012 02:53 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 10-Jul-12 15:37, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-07-10 12:05, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
and what type has the return of map ? Let me guess - array.
Yes, and that is what I _want_.
Too bad, as there is no need to make an array when you map something.
I have no need for streaming data from
the network into a linked list, filter it and then convert it to an
array (or something similar). I want to start with an array and end with
an array.
Then you need something like transform. Anyway the result of map should
be sortable it's a bug.
What would sort do? Special case the result of map and then call
schwartzSort on the underlying range?
It may be a good idea actually. I once found myself in a need to sort
mapped range. I think I just sorted original with "mapped" predicate it
could get slow but in my case it was ok. Then assumeSorted(map!(...)).
--
Dmitry Olshansky
