On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:27:31 +0200, Andrei Alexandrescu <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:

On 7/10/12 8:52 AM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
bearophile (who else? :p) has suggested the addition of eager and in-place
versions of some ranges, and I think he has a very good point.

Where would good old loops not work for eager stuff?

Mostly because I like the std.algorithm way of writing stuff, now we have UFCS.

But yes, could not come up with a good case for not using loops beyond that.

--
Simen

Reply via email to