"Andrei Alexandrescu" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > On 7/10/12 2:08 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: >>> That does seem good to have. What would be a better name than makeRange? >> >> I see no problem with makeRange. It seems like a sensible name to me. >> You're >> taking a sequence of elements and making a range out of them. > > I swear I'd just call it "range". > > Andrei >
tuple(1, 2, 3).rangeOf
