On Wednesday, 11 July 2012 at 18:10:04 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 08:01:44PM +0200, deadalnix wrote:
...
Did you saw the proposal of feep/tgehr on #d ?

It basically state that you can overload a const method with a non
const one if :
 - You don't mutate any data that belong to the parent.
- You are prevented to create any immutable instance of that classe
or any subclasse.

+1, very good, I like this idea!

It is a trade-off, but relatively nice one, IMO.

Reply via email to