This behavior for opEquals is debatable, but make sense.
I don't think it's debatable at all. You must be able to figure out how a class is going to behave just by looking at its definition.
On Thursday, 12 July 2012 at 14:31:34 UTC,
trav...@phare.normalesup.org (Christophe Travert) wrote:
- Making uniform function call syntax more complete a fea... Tommi
- Re: Making uniform function call syntax more compl... Jacob Carlborg
- Re: Making uniform function call syntax more c... Tommi
- Re: Making uniform function call syntax mo... Thiez
- Re: Making uniform function call synta... Timon Gehr
- Re: Making uniform function call synta... Tommi
- Re: Making uniform function call ... Thiez
- Re: Making uniform function c... Tommi
- Re: Making uniform function c... Christophe Travert
- Re: Making uniform functi... Tommi
- Re: Making uniform functi... Simen Kjaeraas
- Re: Making uniform functi... Christophe Travert
