On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:51:15AM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:56:13 -0400, H. S. Teoh > <hst...@quickfur.ath.cx> wrote: > > >On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:31:27AM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: [...] > >>Yes. Where's that new AA struct, Mr. Teoh? :) > >[...] > > > >The code is still here: > > > > https://github.com/quickfur/New-AA-implementation > > > >But I got roadblocked, partially because of constness issues > >(ironically, the problem was that toHash, toString, etc., weren't > >const, and now we're talking about supporting non-const versions of > >them), but more because of problems with IFTI. Or at least, that's > >where I left it about a month ago -- then I was away on vacation and > >haven't had the chance to go back to the code since. :( > > > > Hm... chicken vs. egg again... > > I think we need both the AA update and the removal of opX from > object simultaneously. Should we start a project branch for all the > components? (is that appropriate for git?) [...]
Having more than just me working on the AA project would be a very good thing. I don't always have the time to work on it, and it's not fair to the community that the fate of such a vital component depends on the free time schedule of one person. T -- MS Windows: 64-bit overhaul of 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand 1-bit of competition.