I'm a fresh college graduate who just got a job as a software developer, and I have been enthusiastically watching D for a while now (I program primarily in Java and C). I have some functional programming experience in Haskell and Scala as well.

I like using octal numbers, and I've always been interested in D's octal literals. I'm glad to see that the traditional syntax of C's octal literals is being replaced by a more readable one. However, I can't help but think that the template solution ("octal!nnn") is a little too roundabout; is there a reason that that the "0o" prefix, which is already well established in languages like Haskell, OCaml, and Python, is not used?

Reply via email to