On 27-Jul-12 00:31, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/26/2012 1:14 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:Obviously it's backwards and awful. Makes me wonder why can't we take it directly, what's limitation ? How about allowing it, at least in inline assembly?It can be done, it's just that nobody has done the implementation in the inline assembler.
Great! I guess I should file another enhancement request? -- Dmitry Olshansky
