On Wednesday, August 01, 2012 22:47:47 Philippe Sigaud wrote: > I somehow thought that with UTF-8 you were limited to a part of > Unicode, and to another, bigger part with UTF-16. > I equated Unicode with UTF-32. > This is what completely warped my vision. It's good to learn something > new everyday, I guess.
I guess that that would explain why you didn't understand what I was saying. I was highly confused as to what was confusing about what I was saying, but it didn't even occur to me that you had that sort of misunderstanding. You really should get a better grip on unicode if you want to be writing code that lexes or parses it efficiently (though it sounds like you're reading up on a lot already right now). - Jonathan M Davis