On Sunday, August 05, 2012 04:17:13 bearophile wrote: > Adam D. Ruppe: > > I should add: if a function is not marked @property, it should > > not change at all: it should be callable with and without > > parens, > > I think I'd like functions not marked with @property to require > the ().
I wholeheartedly agree, but it's a divisive subject. Some of us feel very strongly that functions not marked with @property should require parens, and others feel very strongly that they should be optional. - Jonathan M Davis