Am 12.08.2012 02:43, schrieb F i L:
Yes, and this is an excellent argument for using NaN as a
debugging practice in general, but I don't see anything in favor
of defaulting to NaN. If you don't do some kind of check against
code, especially with such large data sets, bugs of various kinds
are going to go unchecked regardless.


is makes absolutely no sense to have different initialization stylel in debug an release - and according to Andrei example: there are many situations where slow-debug code isn't capable to reproduce the error in a human-timespan - especially when working with million, billion datasets (like i also do...)

Reply via email to