On Wednesday, 15 August 2012 at 08:45:35 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
I just pointed out, that possibly stateful implementation doesn't prevent stateless interface. Can one even say that the implementation is stateful given just a stateless interface?
And our point is that such an interface is trivial to implement over a »stateful« interface, and even already exists. Maybe you want to peruse some of the old posts?
David
