On 27 August 2012 11:01, Paulo Pinto <pj...@progtools.org> wrote: > On Monday, 27 August 2012 at 07:54:12 UTC, Manu wrote: > >> >> This sounds like an implementation detail/dmd quirk is defining the >> language spec... >> > > For it sounds like constraining the language while keeping the C/C++ > linker semantics, instead of using a D aware linker. >
I don't see how the linker enters into it. Default args are irrelevant to the linker.
