On 04/09/2012 17:01, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:06:56AM +0100, Russel Winder wrote:
[...]
What is comes down to is whether people testing the evolution of D
tooling would be happy to work with a fork of SCons or whether it is
necessary to work with a separate package and a distributed SCons.
[...]

I'm OK to use a fork of SCons as long as it doesn't disrupt my non-D
projects.


T

+1. I'm happy to accept a reasonable amount of pain to help the evolution of D+Scons.

Reply via email to