On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 08:25 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote: > On 2012-09-13 16:40, Don Clugston wrote: > > > That sounds paranoid to me. I believe the patent is essentially a > > workaround for the absence of thread-local variables on 16-bit Windows. > > BTW, regardless if it's under a patent or not we can't force them to > implement SEH in LLVM. > > The description of the patent just says that it's about a system for > compilers that allow support runtime exception handling.
Presumably the patent (if it exists and is enforceable) only applies in the USA. So for the rest of the world there is absolutely no need to worry about it. Only people in the USA have to worry. Which means one version for in the USA and one version for everywhere else? -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
