Re: no-arg constructor for structs (again)

[monarch_dodra]

On Thursday, 20 September 2012 at 09:22:39 UTC, David wrote:
The only thing I really miss is:

class Foo {}

struct Bar {
    Foo foo = new Foo();
}

void main() {
    Bar s = Bar();
    assert(s.foo !is null);
}

That probably won't _ever_ work, because that is a default 
*instruction*, not a default *value*.

It is a default constructor in disguise :D which is a no-no, as 
it would break all of D's move semantics (which are pretty 
awesome, IMO).