Jacob Carlborg wrote: > On 2012-09-21 16:37, Jens Mueller wrote: > > >If there are use cases I agree. I do not know one. > >The question whether there are *tools* that report in case of success is > >easier to verify. Do you know any tool that does reporting in case > >success? I think gtest does not do it. I'm not sure about JUnit. > >But of course if a unittest has additional information and that is > >already implemented or easy to implement fine with me. My point is more > >that for the common cases you do not need this. Maybe in most. Maybe in > >all. > > Test::Unit, the default testing framework for Ruby on Rails prints a > dot for each successful test.
That is fine. But you don't need the name of the unittest then. Jens
