Some random comments about std.benchmark based on its documentation:

- It is very strange that the documentation of printBenchmarks uses neither of the words "average" or "minimum", and doesn't say how many trials are done....

Because all of those are irrelevant and confusing.

Huh? It's not nearly as confusing as reading the documentation and not having the faintest idea what it will do. The way the benchmarker works is somehow 'irrelevant'? The documentation doesn't even indicate that the functions are to be run more than once!!

I don't think that's a good idea.

I have never seen you make such vague arguments, Andrei.

Reply via email to