On 2012-09-21 23:11, Jens Mueller wrote:
But if you have an assert in some algorithm to ensure some invariant or in a contract it will be handled by myUnitTestSpecificAssertHandler. But I think that is not a drawback. Don't you want to no whenever an assert is violated?
Oh, you mean like that. Sure, but that will only show up as a failed test. For example, in the Ruby world there are two different testing frameworks: Rspec and test-unit. Rspec makes not difference between a thrown exception or a failed test (assert). Test-unit on the other hand do make a difference of these scenarios. I'm leaning more towards the Rspec way of handling this.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
