On 26 September 2012 20:28, Rainer Schuetze <r.sagita...@gmx.de> wrote:
> > I think this should be allowed, aswell as implementing forward declared > enums and structs (IIRC the compiler even has some error messages that > suggest that it is intended). > > As a workaround, you could put your prototypes into a struct and generate > the declarations for the static linking and the stubs for dynamic linking > from their declarations and run your magic on the members of "prototypes": > > struct prototypes > { > void fun1(int a, int b); > void fun2(int a, int b); > } > > mixin(magic([__traits(**allMembers, prototypes)]) > > > That way you don't put the symbols into the same scope as the prototypes, > and you will not add new symbols to the same scope that you are iterating > over. > Good idea! I'll give that a shot. So it seems like there is fairly general consensus on this then, is there a next step? Should I log a bug? (I think I did log one months ago)