On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 23:26:05 +0200, DypthroposTheImposter wrote: > D is pretty cool, perhaps someday I can use it instead of C++ and have > cool shit like fast build times, modules, no more bloody headers, sane > templates, CTFE, UFCS etc > > But can the D GC ever be made: > > 1. precise 2. able to scale to large-ish data set(2gig+) > 3. No long stalls(anything over a couple millisecond(<3)) > > Q. Curious, would it be compacting? > > If not then I'm stuck not using it much-- > > Which leaves me with structs, and lets just say D struct are not > impressive-- > > > * Oh and on a totally unrelated note, D needs Multiple return values. > Lua has it, it's awesome. D doesn't want to be left out does it? > > * OpCmp returning an int is fugly I r sad > > * why is haskell so much shorter syntax, can D get that nice syntax > plssssssssss > > STAB!
Can you write a GC which meets your criteria? If so, D can get one as soon as you write and contribute it. Justin